thedailyfish.net

                                     “Opening minds and angravating liberals since 2001”

                                “I am a guardian of freedom and the American way of life.”

                                                           Genesis 3:19 / John 3:16

 

My Friends & Fellow Confused, PT II:

When we last met we were threatening to get onto a more salient topic. Criminality.

Yes, criminality.

(And before we go any further, I will hate to burst your happy bubble but for the first times this election season the word “criminality” is not connected to the Beast.)   (I am shortening the Hilderbeast to just the “Beast.” No, it has nothing to do with Revelations and the mark of the same, I am tired of the extra seconds she steals from me as I have to type “Hilder.”)

Let’s paint in very broad strokes for the moment.

In the last issue I stated: “Trump is getting beat up from all sides but the actual voters. The RNC claims not to like him, the SRMFM clearly does not like him, the RINOs hate him, the Conservatives really can’t make up their mind so they hate him to be on the safe side but will prolly vote for him and his one real challenger, Cruz, is not feeling the love for him.”

Again, for the umpteenth time, I am not a Trump supporter nor am I carrying any water for him. But he is the candidate that is running who can perfectly explain the inner workings and machinations of the political parties.

Let’s work backwards. We can see why Cruz, and by extension “Short Bus” Kasich, have no love for Trump, he is the one in the way of their greatness.

The Conservatives do not like him because he is not consistent in his “conservative” opinions and still harbors a lot of opinions that are not espoused by the Conservatives. That, and he is willing to change his position on almost any topic mid-sentence. (At least he says it rather than promising not to then changing one’s position once elected.) In other words, he is not conservative enough.

The RINO’s hate him because he espouses what they consider ultra-conservative positions. He is not a go-along to get-along kind of guy. He is not going to follow Earl Mc Cornbread’s or Paul Ryan’s ideas and plans just because they are “leadership.” He has his own opinions and ideas and those are the ones he will follow. In other words, he is too conservative.

The SRMFM does not like him because he is not socialist enough, or at all. He is not an insider, an establishment fixture and despite his support for many liberal causes in the past, even if he still did today, he does not support them as much as does the Beast.

(The SRMFM have no backbone and no courage whatsoever. They will be obedient to whoever is in power, to some degree. But I will let you in on a little secret. Secretly, many of those in the trenches are hoping for a Trump administration. Not because they think he is a really “one of them”, they know better. They do know that Trump in the White House would be a four or eight year target rich environment for news and especially entertainment.)

We can look at all the above and agree or not. Even if every one of those things were dead wrong or spot on, it would make not a whit’s worth of difference, it would not change one vote.

The real critters here are the RNC.

I have been calling that cad “Master Cylinder” Karl Rove “Public Enemy #2”, just after Biff. Why? Why not indeed! Bear in mind, this is the clown that brought us Geo W. Bush and that was the BEST thing he ever did! (And that did not turn out so great. Ask Scooter Libby.) He was the power that stood up the RINO John McLame to run. And look out how well that worked out!

Not to be outdone, the next quadrennial contest saw him back Judas Mittcariot. Judas fooled a lot of us, many of us saw him as the guy who could beat Biff. He destroyed Biff in the first debate and when the second debate came he was so milquetoast that if Candy Crowley could not feed Biff a wrong answer quickly enough, he was Johnny-on-the-spot to help her out. Again, look how well that turned out.

I am not saying Judas threw the debate, I am saying he was told to throw the debate and from that moment on all but dared us to vote for him. (And who was his VP nominee, where is he today and there is no collusion or quid pro quo?)

Now, here we are, again locked in a mortal battle with evil. (And when I say that, I mean straight from the bowels of hell kind of evil. No? Exhibit A – Biff, Exhibit B – the Beast, Exhibit C – Geo Soros, Exhibit D – David Rockefeller, need I go on?) Who does Rove pick? Does he pick George Patton? No, he picks Gomer Pyle.

(Perhaps instead of Patton I should have said Chesty Puller, as Pyle was a Marine. Or, I could have said Will Stockdale, but that was the Air Force. Or Ensign Parker, nope, Navy. I guess the Army did not have any screw-ups.   LOL!)

Yes, in this case the Gomer Pyle is the least likely one you would think, Little Jebbie Bush (or Jeborah, your choice.) This trained seal would do anything that Rove would tell him and I think the people were just a little too sharp to see Little Jebbie as a viable candidate. And to be fair to Jebbie, if Trump was not on the dais he may have had a shot. But Trump’s personality is almost as big as his ego and he made Jebbie and others look like wimps, especially when going one-on-one with Trump.

Over one-hundred million dollars wasted and Jebbie, with no wind, smartens up and drops out.

Do Rove and the RNC Chair, Rancid Prius, see the writing on the wall, cave and back Trump?

No, don’t be silly, that would make sense. Or at least back Cruz, the most Conservative and who has the best chance of surviving Trump.

They back that weak-sweaty-sister Dorko Rubio.

(They say Cruz in unlikable. Maybe so. But I am not having tea with the President so I would rather have one that is not a laughingstock. Again.   And not for anything I do not find Dorko that charming.)

Now Dorko is dead meat, here comes Judas Mittcarriot again.

Really? Are we THAT stupid?

You would think the only game in town to the eyes of most people in the RNC leadership is that useful tool, Short Bus Kasich.

Here is where reading between the lines comes in handy.

You see, the RNC fathers know Kasich is not their guy.   If he was they, would be pouring shedloads of cash into his campaign in order to siphon more votes from Trump in order to force a contested convention. Don’t misunderestimate me, it is not that he would not be a good and faithful lap dog and do their biding, but I think they want someone who is already trained. But Lord knows who they really want, as Judas did not fly. Again, again.

But despite that, that is not what makes me think the fix is in, or if it is, that that is the driving force in selecting the “nominee” with the blessing of the party opposite.

You see, if there were to be no Trump, there would be a Little Jebbie or a Dorko. They would not have been exposed for the weaklings they are.   Dorko prolly would have gotten the nomination, as in 2008, they would have played the race card this time and he or the Beast (if she can escape incarceration) would win and it would be business as usual for RNC, Inc., and DNC, Inc.

But, no.

Trump.

RNC, Inc. might possibly do everything in their power to stop Trump even at the expense of having the Beast in the White House. (Socialist Sanders would never get elected and his place in the contest was to make the Beast not look like a Marxist. If the Beast gets some bracelets that are not from Jarrod’s, Bernie might do well to avoid being in rooms with area rugs.)

If the Beast should get elected, it is still business as usual for RNC, Inc. Or, at least they are still in business.

Should Trump prevail, the monopoly that was once Rove and Co., will be broken.

Rove has no hooks in Trump.

Trump owes Rove nothing.

So when Rove, Rancid or anyone else comes around to “tell” Trump who they want for this position or that cabinet position or that ambassadorship, he will tell them to pound sand.

To be fair while Trump knows a million “amazing”, “huge”, “incredible” people in all walks of life I am not certain that he knows who the “best” people would be to fill the myriad positions of patronage and esteem. And to be fair, Trump’s strong suit in business has been to find the right people to do the job. That said, he prolly knows the people that know the people for the job.

Of course there are more and greater issues with which to contend before one announces a wake call for the RNC.   Such as the Congressional elections and do the Republicans maintain majority, add or lose? And knowing the White House is out of their control, might the RNC double down and stack the deck in Congress with their own?

Soon we shall see. It is going to be a tough ride for both parties and truly the only winner that I care about is my Country. I can’t tell you for sure who I want to win but I can tell you whom I don’t. That would be anyone with a “D” after their name.

And, yes, you know me so well… more to come on this.

Last and certainly not least, I wish each and every one of you and yours a very Happy Easter.

(I know that not all of you are Christian and this is OK. I do not wish you a Happy Easter for any other reason than it is our most important Holy Day and I want to share that joy with you.   And as I wish everyone a happy whatever holiday or Holyday you celebrate, I am just doing my best to remain not politically correct by offering Spring Equinox felicitations but Happy Easter.   Now, go have fun.)

 

“Opening minds and angravating liberals since 2001”

“I am a guardian of freedom and the American way of life.”

Genesis 3:19 / John 3:16

My Friends & Fellow Math Scholars:

The other day, one of youse posted something on my personal Facebook page.   I was really touched by the post.  The fellow who posted it, a fellow vet, has been a long time reader and we have communicated a number of times over the years.

The post simply read: “Hang out with me for too long and I’ll brainwash you into thinking for yourself.”

I was touched, as I said, and I commented “You know me so well.”

That, my friends, is the mission statement of The Daily Fish.

I have said all along, I try to remain as impartial as I can be, difficult given the last decade.  But I never pontificate that only I have the right answer.  Oftimes, I will suggest a number of possibilities and wax rhapsodic on each.  But the bottom line is that I present either an argument or a soliloquy and the end you draw your own conclusions. Don’t go by me alone.  After all, you pay nothing for this piece of my time every so often and I try to give you your money’s worth!

One of the things I have stated over the years is to “read between the lines”, that is, what is NOT being stated.  How do you know what is not there? Well, if you read enough articles on the same topic eventually there will be any number of things which are different from each one. Some will cancel others out, some are mere repetitions of something else but there will be a few nuggets that will cause you to re-read a sentence or a paragraph as it contains something new.

Recall when I mentioned the brilliant job our brains do 24/7/365 filtering all sorts of things.  Some are important (alerting us to alarms, gun shots, Hilderbeast’s lying) and alerting us to be on guard.  As well as things mundane, such as background noise, a gentle wind, normal traffic and the like.

And that there was a third possibility; the unsure.

I gave the example of you are sitting in a crowded restaurant with a friend or loved one and there are a hundred people having fifty conversations.  You are oblivious to the other forty-nine conversations until you hear your name across the room.  You immediately stop and look around to see who spoke of you.

You were consciously listening to your diner mate but your brain was monitoring all the other conversations seeking clues, signs of danger or anything out of the ordinary.

Same thing when you read an article.  You have already read a dozen or so articles on the same topic and out of the blue, BAM, there is something new.

THAT is reading between the lines.

Now as we are in the middle of the insane pageant of political chicanery and, as the stakes have never been higher, we have to ramp up our prognostication skills a few notches.

We canNOT possibly believe everything that every candidate says, or 99% of what any Democrat opines.  We canNOT afford to be like the Dems where their candidates are equally lethal for our Country. Only the methods of our demise are differing.

George Friedman came up with something called “constraint theory.” It is a nonquantitative piece of multidimensional mathematics.  The book he wrote on this topic has more to do with business rubrics but can easily be massaged for most any other situation.

(For instance: Biffistan declares war on Romneyville.  We are unsure for whom to back, all other things being equal. It then boils down to an economic exercise in that who much would it cost to do this or that.  What will it cost is if we don’t.  It is not all fun with numbers as one of the variables can be the number of casualties.)

On the other hand there are the theories of probability and predictable outcome theories.

Do note, the word “theory” is used in all of these as there is no certainty at hand until after the fact.  A little hard to “check your work” before handing it in!

Add to all this, the thoughts of one of my favorite SecDefs, Don Rumsfeld.

He mused on one occasion: “Reports that say that something hasn’t happened are always interesting to me, because as we know, there are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns – the ones we don’t know we don’t know. And if one looks throughout the history of our country and other free countries, it is the latter category that tend to be the difficult ones.”

I posit that the good secretary had employed any number and permutations of the previous mentioned “theories” to in an attempt to divine the “unknown unknowns.”

We will get to the politics of the day in a moment, this is all needed for background and, with hope, allow you to draw your own conclusions and candidates.

I have been using a mélange of those theories, unbeknownst to me.  In fact I did not even know there were names for them until I “started to do the math.”

Basically take any set of variables. Key to any likelihood of success is not to have any preconceived idea as to any kind of desired or undesired outcome.  Think off all possibilities as your children: you do not love one more or less than the others. (Though, my mother favored me.  Can’t blame her.)

Like the “constraint theory”, you eliminate all results that would be impossible.  (The Hilderbeast becoming a nun and turning herself into the FBI for her crimes, for instance.)

In the process of assigning valuation to the rest of the possibilities a pattern will generally emerge as to the trend as to where the logical result might be.

However, if things are not going according to Hoyle and a representative chart of probability is not providing any kind of rational solution, you may have uncovered one of Rummy’s “unkown unknowns.”

(As I have expressed before, my thought processes are not the type in common with most folks. So nontraditional or nonquantitative thought processes are more the norm for me and I was heartened to see that there was actually math that buttressed my ideas.)

In the next issue we will start to deconstruct the various candidates, their initiatives and platforms, how that plays to the various factions of the electorate and other variables.

My methodology will entail listing the impossible and then coming up with a list of probabilities, possibilities, likelys, and the unlikelys and improbables to go with the impossibilities.

You can all play.  Feel free to send me your thoughts on any candidate and any level of thought from impossible to likely.  If I get enough of a sampling we can use that as a baseline and see how well your powers of divination are.

In issues prior I have cited the name of the old “Firesign Theater” album: “Everything You Know Is Wrong.”  In this election, that just might be true.

Last election, I do not recall many of us excited by the now-called “Judas Mittcariot.” But back then we all detested Biff and wanted him gone.  Alas, that was not to be as apparently Judas Mittcariot liked him just fine.  Or at least enough to throw the election. IMHBAO.

Time before, even fewer of us backed the RINO McLame.  We were temporarily fixated on Sarah Palin who, by comparison, seemed like the real deal.  But even Klondike Barbie turned out to be a disappointment on a number of levels.  (That is a clue.)

This time we do not have the benefit of hindsight to help us out.  Other than the Hilderbeast none of these clowns have been trying for the big dance before.

Most of us are painfully unaware of even a fair amount of what “our guy” REALLY stands for or stood for previously.  Some look like one thing and are really another, some seem to stick to their guns while others treat points and positions like moving targets.

And those are the peeps we LIKE!  The one “known known” is that none of us (correct me if I am wrong) want any “D” to win ANY seat, especially the big one.

Or, might there be the odd exception?  (Recall how I suggested that I would be fine if Earl McCornbread and Smoking Johnny lost their seats?  They did not and we are the worse for it.)

So, hang on, it is going to get rough as we dive into the murky waters of uncertainty.  We will try to makes sense of these characters, or, at least enough for you to make an educated decision on “our” guy.  And I guarantee you that exposed to the same set of “facts” and “deconstruction”, we will not all agree as to the “best” candidate.

Think about all the above and please, PLEASE, take a few minutes to do your homework and send me your thoughts and ideas.

 

 

“Opening minds and angravating liberals since 2001”

“I am a guardian of freedom and the American way of life.”

Genesis 3:19 / John 3:16

My Friends & Fellow Sheeples:

Just in case you thought things were strange last issue then “you ain’t seen nothing yet.”

(Again, clear disclosure.  I am NOT a Trump supporter. I am a supporter of America.  I prefer any “Republican” to either of the Socialists and, after voting for McLame and Judas Mittcariot, I could vote for any of these current idiots.)

I start this issue Thursday afternoon, after Judas Mittcariot made an utter ass of himself and exposed the soft-white underbelly of the despicable Republican National Committee and Trump, being Trump, gave a soft rebuttal to Judas.

A few points.

Do not miss the true big picture because of the “big picture” the RINOS want you to see.

Judas Mittcariot made a series of damning statements about Trump.  Candidly it makes little difference if they were true or not.  There was prolly some truth and some fiction and after Trump’s speech, he did a fair job of acquitting himself.  The fact was he went up there and tried to destroy Trump and even more perplexing (though I am sure it will be explained away) he did not suggest one of the other candidates (or, himself) would be a better alternative.

The fact that Judas made that speech is critical.  What is more critical is what is not being said.  (Remember I told you, read between the lines, what is NOT being said.)

Do you think that Judas woke up and said “Gee, what a nice day, let me get some air time and vent a tad.”

Of course not.

Either on his own or by selection by the powers that be, there was some discussion with the RNC.  By that I mean Public Enemy #2, the Master Cylinder Karl Rove and RNC Chair Rancid Prius. Their blessing was given and off went the Mittless Wonder.

There were threats veiled and innuendo proffered.  There was talk that the RNC might withhold support for Trump.

Might?

After that loser’s hissy-fit, I posted the following on the RNC pages, my page, a number of other groups and in tweets the following: I hope

DEAR RNC: I AM NOT A TRUMP GUY, I AM A FAIRNESS GUY. YOU MADE TRUMP SIGN A LOYALTY OATH TO THE PARTY NOT TO RUN AS A 3RD PARTY CANDIDATE. TODAY, YOU TROT OUT MITT ROMNEY (THE ONE THAT LOST TO THE WORST POSSIBLE CANDIDATE EVER) TO TEAR TRUMP APART. AS A REGISTERED REPUBLICAN I CALL ON ALL OTHER FELLOW REPUBLICANS TO DEMAND THAT THE RNC BACK 100% THE CANDIDATE THAT WE THE PEOPLE CHOSE TO RUN AS A REPUBLICAN. IF YOU DO NOT DO THAT, YOU DO NOT REPRESENT THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE AND WE WILL DECIDE ON OUR OWN. YOU NEED TO DISAVOW ROMNEY’S WORDS AND SWEAR TO SUPPORT THE PEOPLE’S CHOICE, WHOEVER THAT MAY BE. THIS IS NOW GOING VIRAL.
I hope that you agree and will post and share that as well.

(SOAPBAR: Mitt presented himself as a choir boy when he was running.  Yet he went on this insulting tirade at the Hinkley Institute at the University of Utah.  Among other things they “support” are minority rights and Planned Parenthood, hardly “conservative” issues.  On a related note, his accusatory tone of Trump vacillating on his opinions was second only to his own.  After all, Judas Mittcariot’s health care plan in Massachusetts was the template for the illegal OBAMA’S OBAMACARE. Just sayin’.)

The RNC demanded a loyalty oath from Trump then they try to railroad him.  And again no one is talking about that.

Speaking of support, something else off the radar are the musings of some mush-heads and haters of the party.  More than one (Ex-Rino Gov. Christie Todd Whitman, Rep. Adam Kinzinger, et alia) have said that they would vote for the Hilderbeast before Trump.

I do not care if you are a 100% Conservative or have the highest ACU rating in your state (which neither of them are or have) you should be drummed out of the party.

Well, you would be, except that you are saying EXACTLY what the Party Line now is.

(Think about it, Whitless is as relevant as Ellen Degenerate’s last girlfriend and, Adam Who?)

That is two things under the radar.

The last, for now, is the most disturbing.  Rather than rehashing my previous thoughts, here is what I posted Thursday afternoon.

If Judas Mittcariot was as brutal on Biff four years ago as he was on the Trumpster today, Biff would be a towel boy in a bath house, the Hilderbeast would be in stir, we never would have had Obama Care we never would have heard of Eric Holder, Butch Kagan, Sonny Sotomayor, “Beer Summits”, BLM, apologies to Haji, we would not have a criminal cartel running the banking system (well, maybe we would have) and a litany of other ills and the Mittster would be cruising to re-election.

But he was a feckless coward then and is a cheap-shot artist feckless coward now.

So, and please excuse me for this, but I think we owe Biff an apology. He was going to do what he did, a creatchure canNOT change it spots. He was going to screw the pooch one way or the other, it is in his questionable DNA. Judas Mittcariot backed down from this little girl in a debate and let him win.

So, all the troubles in my Country right now I lay at the feet of Judas Mittcariot.
(And again, I am not a Trump guy. I just have some sick in my mouth from when that quisling lied earlier today.)

Disagree? By all means, but please bring your facts.

 

Meanwhile, and thusfar, Ted Cruz and Dorko Rubio have kept their silence, as has the other guy, good old whatshisname.  Of course it is in their benefit for the RNC to excoriate Trump. Only they can benefit by their treachery.

OPENBAR –  Since we are talking about things that are important but no one else is, there is one, glaring, important statistic that is not getting much traction: Voter turnout.  The Republicans are up from 10-50% in voter turnout so far while the Socialists are off 10-30+%.

Why?

In a word: Trump.

His supporters are showing up in great numbers and the supporters of the others are showing up in great numbers to counter them.  This is one of those rising tides that raise all ships.

The RNC is pathologically neglectful in this statistic.  They ignore that Trump is mobilizing the folks, his fans and detractors.  And if you let nature take its course, the discussions of all the candidates will be fleshed out and the last man standing’s vitriol will be focused on the Socialist and the lemming like attention of the average vote will follow that focus.

That is enough for now.

The next in this series will start to focus on why the RNC is doing this and what the true stories may be.

Spoiler alert: We are screwed (and I am being optimistic.)

 

“Opening minds and angravating liberals since 2001”

“I am a guardian of freedom and the American way of life.”

Genesis 3:19 / John 3:16

 

My Friends & Fellow Side Show Fans:

The freak show of a circus continues…

Yes, according to what I have heard and read of late, we are all stupid.  We are all too dim-witted to see the elegance of the actions of Biff.  Yes, he is the smartest biped ever to roam the Earth!

Recall early on, we saw one of the first signs that the fix was in.  Some spokesperson or another said that Biff was the “smartest man ever to be president.” When asked what was his IQ, the answer was: “way high, off the charts.”  Asked again and a similarly vague answer was offered.

I am not saying he is not smart, I am sure he has some smarts.  Then again so does a circus clown and that is where we are; in a circus, in a freak show.

(JFK once said at a dinner honoring Nobel Prize winners, back in the day when it meant something [and presidents were not out to destroy us]: “I think this is the most extraordinary collection of talent, of human knowledge, that has ever been gathered together in the White House, with the possible exception of when Thomas Jefferson dined alone.”  Yeah, like Biff is smarter than that.  Hear that whirring sound…?)

On the one hand, the same Geek Chorus who said back in 2006 and 2007 that if, IF there was a vacancy on SCOTUS Bush should not be allowed to nominate are the same ones demanding that Biff not only nominate someone to fill Scalia’s chair (certainly not his intellect) but the Republicans should be honored to confirm him/her/gender fluid to the bench.

Needless to say the useful tools on social media are making the same noise. At least here I have fun.  I tell them what Schemer said and of course they deny it.  Give them a bunch of citations and they still won’t believe.

Add the clips of Joey McMensa saying the same thing and they still can’t wrap their scrawny arms around that.  So the camps are divided in half: some say it is all made up (denial, so sad) and the rest say that “things are different now.”

When I ask how so and when was Article II, Section 2, Clause 2 changed and then their heads explode.  I thank them for their ignorance and hypocrisy and I move along.

You see, if Biff was a good person, a trusted person, a good and fair leader, a jealous protector of the Constitution, I assure you, the Senate would be eager to entertain a replacement.

But, sad for us, he is none of those things.  He is a liar, a cheat, a fraud, a conman, a grifter, a racist and a hater of America.  Can you blame the Senate (and most of them are not that much better than Biff) for not doing what he asks?

Meanwhile, the thusfar still on the street, Hilderbeast boasted that she would appoint a “progressive” to the Supremes.

That line alone should send shivers down your spine and disqualify her from high office.

The Justices of the SCOTUS should be non-partisan, should be agenda-free, should be unbeholden to the man who appoints them, should be able to impartially and unemotionally rule on any decision without any prejudice and so on.

Basically, they should be EVERYTHING that Biff’s nominees have not been.

We can look at Sotomayor and find fault.  We can look at Butch Kagan and not only find fault but perhaps criminality for not recusing herself during the OBAMA’S OBAMACARE trial.  And the first name Biff floats to fill Scalia’s seat is the Latino Republican of Nevada.

Yeah he is a “Republican” like most “Republicans”, that being a RINO.   Add to that he is a pal of Dingy Harry.  Oh, he is pro-infanticide.

So, Biff tries to pimp and fool the Republicans, the Latinos (because we know there will never be a case involving the illegals before SCOTUS, right….) and the baby-killers.

When you try to fool everyone you fool no one.  And it is only the mentally defective who think otherwise.

As I said last issue, we do not want or need a moderate on the bench and we certainly do not need an activist or a progressive or a socialist or anyone chosen by one who is.

And that, my children and fellow grasshoppers, is the crux of this particular biscuit.

In the worst of times, the worst president will do their best to keep us safe (Biff not as much as he could.) In the best of times, they not only kept us safe but made us strong and feared by our enemies.  He did the best for the majority of the commonwealth and did little for special interest or activist agenda groups. (God Bless you, Ronald Reagan.)

Other than keeping us safe the next most critical job of a president is to ensure the laws are being acted on properly, laws are being followed, lawlessness is punished and the Law of the Land is properly interpreted.

That is why, other than the responsibility for the nuclear football, the most important thing a President does is to nominate people to the SCOTUS.

Sometimes a President gets it right (Scalia [Reagan], Thomas [GHW Bush], Alito [GW Bush]) sometimes the President gets it wrong (Souter [GHW Bush], Breyer [Clinton], Roberts [GW Bush]), and sometimes the president picks a tool that should be nowhere near that level of power (Butch [Biff], Sotomayor [Biff].)

The bottom line is that the nomination of one to be a Justice does not always work out.  (Biggest shock, and quisling, was Roberts.)  But unless there are other “Roberts’” out there, and I am sure there are, one hopes the next President (or God Forbid, president) will exercise all due diligence and counsel to pick the right person for the job.

Yes, there is a big stink going on now with Biff trying to twist arms to get his guy/gay/gal/gender-fluid/illegal alien on the bench.  I must say I do not have the confidence that I wish I had that Earl McCornbread is not going to sell the people of America for a few pieces of silver. He is barely a step above Dingy Harry.

To his credit, as far as we know, he held fast in a meeting with Biff et al on Tuesday.  To his shame, Sen. Leahy (A-Hat) lied when he said the “president shall nominate and the Senate shall…”  Er, no, the Senate “shall” do no such thing.  But, he is a weasel, what do you expect.

In the last issue I showed the paradigm shift in the Court from barely Originalist, to split, to Activist.  (I calls ‘em as I sees ‘em.)

When you have people (not “men”) like Leahy, Biff, Hilderbeast, Dingy Harry and others who have such little regard for us that they will boldface lie to us with what is easily found to be true in the Constitution, it shows a pathological personality.

But my concern is not with the current vacancy. For all I could care it is nothing but political posturing on both sides.  Someone, eventually, is going to get that seat.

The odds are not looking good for Biff to get that chance but nothing is foolproof as this fool has proved time and time again.

To summarize and to set the table for future issues, the following:

Justice Ginsberg is 82, Kennedy is 79 and Breyer is 77.

It is not out of the realm of possibility that the next P/president will nominate not one, but absent of other influences and accidents, as many as three or four.

We NEED, we MUST replace Scalia with an originalist just to maintain status quo.  With two of the three likely to no longer be on the bench in the foreseeable future of the Left and the third the unpredictable “swing vote”, can you now see how critical it is not to elect any Democrat/Socialist/Communist/Marxist?

For one, those who would vote for a Democrat/Socialist/Communist/Marxist have proven that they are mentally deficient and we must be protected from them and us from them.

Second, most of those folks regard the Constitution like BJ Clinton respects his marriage vows.  Meaning they will try to get away with everything and if they get caught, big deal, who cares, none of your business.

Except that it is.

(Hilderbeast is promising a “progressive”, Biff said he won’t nominate a “moderate.”  If you know what the charge of the SCOTUS is this flies in the face of it.  Both of these clowns should be barred in perpetuity from making such a nomination. Yet, their pinions cheer.  And again, proof of mental defect.)

To put a finer point on this the greatest threat to our Nation is the person who may be elected to the highest office in the land, IF it is not the RIGHT person.

We will discuss this more as we discuss the pros and cons of the Republicans.  There is no sense to even to discuss the Hilderbeast or Socialist Sanders.  They are one in the same, but as much as I do not trust the Hilderbeast, I trust Socialist Sanders that much less.

Last word: Supposedly, sometime today, Mitt “The Loser” Romney is going to give a news conference on Lord Knows what. I can only assume it will be either/or anti-Trump or the words of the Master Cylinder and the rest of the “RINO” power “elite.”  I find it odd that the powers that be tapped a big loser to tell Trump where he is going wrong or to lay out the case that they need to pick anyone but Trump. Romney is beneath contempt and almost as abhorrent as Rove.  You can be sure I will have a few words.

Out.